Healthy Homes Asia

Symptoms

AIDS, actually not one disease but a collection of many different conditions brought under the AIDS umbrella, manifests itself variously with opportunistic infections such as thrush, yeast infections like Candida, pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and other, so-called AIDS-defining diseases. Sudden, unexplainable commencement of fevers, sweats, flu-like symptoms, diarrhoea, swelling of lymph glands and rashes on the body. Dark, cancerous skin lesions, such as Karposi’s sarcoma, are often found on the body.

Commentary

One of the greatest scandals in medicine today surrounds the classification of AIDS as an infectious disease. The supposed pathogen, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), despite much fanfare and fear-mongering, has never been isolated according to any recognised and appropriate scientific procedure. And so, from a scientific standpoint, HIV can be deemed not to exist. In the 16 years since Dr Robert Gallo’s ‘discovery’ of HIV (for which he was later indicted for science fraud), no empirical proof of the existence of an HIV virus or retrovirus has ever been furnished to the scientific establishment, much less satisfactorily connected with how AIDS symptoms are supposed to be caused by it.

First world AIDS

All the evidence shows that immune suppression (‘AIDS’) in the First World is primarily brought on by long-term recreational or pharmaceutical drug toxicity AND IS NOT INFECTIOUS OR SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED. AIDS in the first world does not behave like a sexually transmitted, infectious disease at all. AIDS is still within its risk groups after over 25 years supposedly rampaging through a sexually driven public. Only 5% of the homosexual community has a problem with immune suppression, 95% don’t. The 5% who do will usually have a history of immuno-suppressant activity, drug-taking (recreational and pharmaceutical), which will adequately explain their current predicament.

If you are going to tell the public that HIV is spread sexually, then where is the AIDS epidemic in Britain today? Did Britain suddenly stop having unprotected sex? And how come HIV is supposed to be spread through the transfer of blood and other body fluids, and yet mosquitoes don’t spread it? You do not need HIV to explain the phenomenon of AIDS either in the western world or in third world countries.

Third world AIDS

Third world or ‘African’ ‘AIDS’ is nothing more than the cynical reclassification of diseases that have always killed Africans and other citizens: dysentery, cholera, diarrhoea, malnutrition, TB, malaria and parasitic infections, brought on by the frequently contaminated water supplies poor citizens in these regions are forced to consume. Africans are almost always classified as ‘AIDS carriers’ through the arbitrary visual-only Bangui definition.

Bogus testing procedures

Many unwitting victims in the first world are drawn into the AIDS nightmare after being frightened by advertising or newspaper articles into believing that they might ‘be at risk’. And so they are talked into taking ‘an AIDS test’. The ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immuno-Absorbent Assay) and Western Blot tests are designed to highlight the presence of the supposed HIV, not by identifying any virus itself, but by tracing the presence of antibodies in the blood, allegedly unique to, and said to be stimulated by a virus or retrovirus no-one can seem to find.

The only real difference between the two tests is that the ELISA is supposed to measure antibody activity as a whole, whereas the Western Blot measures reactions to separate proteins supposedly making up the virus. As a result of this claim, the Western Blot method is deemed by most in the AIDS industry to be more specific than the ELISA test, and will often be used to confirm a positive ELISA test and the equally unrealiable PCR viral load tests. [1] The problem is, all the diagnostic methods employed by the recognised laboratories are far from specific. Author Christine Maggiore, herself a victim of these fraudulent tests, states the major problem as follows:

“Both tests are non-specific to HIV antibodies and are highly inaccurate. Non-specific means that these tests respond to a great number of non-HIV antibodies, microbes, bacteria and other conditions that are often found in the blood of normal, healthy people. A reaction to any one of these other antibodies and conditions will result in an HIV-positive diagnosis. A simple illness like a cold or the flu can cause a positive reading on an HIV test. A flu shot or other vaccine can also create positive results. Having or having had herpes or hepatitis may produce a positive test, as can a vaccination for hepatitis B. Exposure to diseases such as tuberculosis and malaria commonly cause false positive results, as do the presence of tape worms and other parasites. Conditions such as alcoholism, liver disease and blood that is highly oxidated through drug use may be interpreted as the presence of HIV antibodies. Pregnancy and prior pregnancy can also cause a positive result.”[2]

The triggering of an HIV-positive result will lead invariably to prescriptions for the deadly cell toxins AZT, ddI and other ‘HIV’ drugs (protease inhibitors, etc.), which have an appalling history of causing the very immune deficiencies they were supposedly designed to prevent, but they do rack up the drug profits. South African barrister Anthony Brink remarks:

“In truth, AZT makes you feel like you’re dying. That’s because on AZT you are. How can a deadly cell toxin conceivably make you feel better as it finishes you, by stopping your cells from dividing, by ending this vital process that distinguishes living things from dead things? Not for nothing does AZT come with a skull and cross-bones label when packaged for laboratory use.”[3] 

And indeed that is the case. With a skull and cross-bones on the outer label and a reminder towearsuitable protective clothing when handling, the inner contents of the AZT packaging include the following side-effects advisory notice:

WHOLE BODY: abdominal pain, back pain, body odour, chest pain, chills, edema of the lip, fever, flu symptoms, hyperalgesia.

CARDIOVASCULAR: syncope, vasodilation.

GASTROINTESTINAL: bleeding gums, constipation, diarrhoea, dysphagia, edema of the tongue, eructation, flatulence, mouth ulcer, rectal haemorrhage.

HAEMIC AND LYMPHATIC: lymphadenopathy.

MUSCULOSKELETAL: arthralgia, muscle spasm, tremor, twitch.

NERVOUS: anxiety, confusion, depression, dizziness, emotional liability, loss of mental acuity, nervousness, paresthesia, somnolence, vertigo.

RESPIRATORY: cough, dyspnea, epistaxis, hoarseness, pharyngitis, rhinitis, sinusitis.

SKIN: rash, sweat, urticaria.

SPECIAL SENSES: amblyopia, hearing loss, photophobia, taste perversion.

UROGENITAL: dysuria, polyuria, urinary frequency, urinary hesitancy.

I spent some time in the US working among homosexuals deemed HIV-positive by the medical establishment. In all cases, their plight could be laid at the door of malnutrition, parasite/fungal infections, and recreational or pharmaceutical drug abuse. Their sure and ready remedy was to cease the drug abuse and move towards wellness with a properly constructed regimen of sound nutrition and supplementation.

Our full report on AIDS is contained in The Truth About HIV, the result of over 15 years’ research into this tragically misunderstood realm of medical error. The further tragedy is that expectant mothers are now required to take an ‘HIV’ test, resulting in more than a few cases being deemed HIV-positive simply because of the antibody load picked up by these tests. The resultant medication is as catastrophic to the baby as it is to the mother. For this reason, we issue the following advisory to all pregnant mothers around the world:

Health warning to expectant mothers

If you have recently become pregnant, you may be recommended to take an HIV test as part of a standardised ante-natal care package.[4] This test is highly inaccurate and remains scientifically unproven. It should be refused on the following grounds:

1) All manufacturers of these tests include the following or similar disclaimer with their test kits: “At present, there is no recognised standard for establishing the presence or absence of antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV- 2 in human blood.”[5]

2) The reason for this disclaimer is because the AIDS test does not measure the presence of a virus.[6] The AIDS test has been designed to detect levels of antibody activity in the blood. Antibody activity in the bloodstream is a normal occurrence in humans, but is being misinterpreted by the AIDS test as indicative of the presence of HIV.

3) As a result of this misinterpretation, healthy individuals are being wrongly diagnosed as HIV positive. Since this information has come to light, in excess of 60 different medical conditions have been recorded that can give rise to a false HIV-positive reading. These separate conditions include flu, flu vaccination, malaria, tetanus vaccination, hepatitis A and B, hepatitis vaccinations, fungal infections, alcohol and drug use, recent viral infections and even pregnancy.[7] Receiving a spurious but wholly devastating diagnosis of HIV-positive will prompt your doctor to recommend a course of ‘anti-HIV’ drugs. Known as protease inhibitors or anti-retrovirals, these drugs are highly toxic. They have the well-documented capacity to harm the mother, and also severely to deform and even kill the unborn child.[8]

The current levels of spending on AIDS drugs in the western world are phenomenal. So too are the profits enjoyed by the AIDS drug manufacturers. As a result, the information contained in this advisory is largely being ignored by the medical establishment. Sadly, this is not an unexpected reaction. The pursuit of profit at the expense of health, the wilful employment of flawed medical procedures, the administration of dangerously toxic drugs to expectant mothers, the disregard for the plight of thousands upon thousands of wrongly diagnosed people, and a refusal by the medical establishment to listen to sound contrary evidence or to admit medical negligence - all are the hallmarks of that once-respected drug, thalidomide. Do not allow either yourself or your child to face the possibility of becoming another heartbreaking medical statistic. For more information on AIDS, please obtain a copy of World Without AIDS, available through Credence Publications.

Take action©

If you have been diagnosed with ‘HIV infection’ or ‘AIDS’, the following protocol may be beneficial. Please note that conditions diagnosed as AIDS are dangerous and life-threatening, and a medical specialist should always be consulted. The following regimen, if you choose to follow it, must be rigorously adhered to, preferably under supervision of a doctor acquainted with nutritional and detoxification protocols:

·         TIP: Hire the services of a medical doctor (MD) or naturopathic physician (ND), trained in nutrition and aware of the AIDS/HIV deception

·         TIP: Take no further ‘AIDS tests’

·         PREVENTION: Consider immediately dropping the use of AIDS medications, especially nucleoside analogues and DNA chain-terminators. These are heavily immuno-suppressive and carcinogenic, bringing on the very symptoms of the problem you are trying to conquer

·         PREVENTION: Cease taking ALL recreational drugs, including the sex-stimulant amyl nitrite (poppers - known to cause Karposi’s sarcoma). If you have a drug addiction, a suitable clean-up program should be sought out and rigorously adhered to

·         PREVENTION: If you are a homosexual, avoid sex and the lifestyle that goes with the ‘fast-track’ homosexual community. Unprotected sex with multiple partners heightens the chances of contracting sexually transmitted diseases, such as herpes, gonorrhoea, syphilis, etc.. Incessant drinking, the taking of drugs, the ongoing regimens of antibiotics, not eating properly, etc., are problems which themselves will generate antibodies that can be interpreted as HIV-specific by these tests (they are not). Once you have triggered a positive AIDS test, physicians will usually then prescribe dangerous cell toxins, such as AZT

·         DIET AND DETOXIFICATION: Follow the regimen for cancer explained in the appropriate section of this book. This regimen addresses fungal/yeast infections, cancer, immuno-suppressant problems, detoxification, nutritional support and a correct and cleansing diet. With AIDS, it is also what you give up that will make the difference between life and death.

Further resources

The Truth About HIV by Steven Ransom and Phillip Day

The ABC’s of Disease by Phillip Day

Some Conquerors

“The greatest darkness cannot extinguish the radiating

light of even the smallest candle.” (anon)

  PHILLIP DAY’S COMMENT: Let us remind ourselves that lies are conquered by truth. What better way can there be to introduce the beginning of the end of AIDS than by reading the tremendous testimonies of those individuals who are alive and well in spite of their diagnosis. These are the stories of people who have come out or are coming out from under the curse of the myth of HIV.

Details for the following testimonies are on file with Credence Publications and associated organisations. Please contact us at Credence Publications if you have a genuine enquiry or a testimony you would like to share.

  “I had my positive diagnosis in 1987. In setting up the Long Term Survivors Network, I have been challenged on using the term ‘survivor’, the argument being that if the HIV test is not an indication of future ill-health then we haven’t survived, as we had nothing to survive. I would dispute that, for we have survived an assault on the very basic human spirit; ostracism from society, poisoning of the mind by fear, attempts to control our sexual and reproductive needs as well as pressure to take toxic and experimental drugs. No mean feat! The point is, it’s a possibility we may not be survivors of HIV, but we are survivors in life. We should not forget that alongside the questions around HIV and the dilemmas and decisions we make, we are dealing with other things that life throws at any of us.” Claire W.   

“When I tested positive in 1988, I was told I had only three years to live. Twelve years later, I’m doing just fine. I have never taken any AIDS drugs, even though they were suggested and even pushed. In 1996, I got married – five years after I was supposed to be dead. I’m very much alive and healthy and wish people would listen to me and other people like me for a change. Ignorance is the real epidemic.”  Michele M.

“I’ve known over 200 people who died of so-called AIDS. Every one of them had sufficient drug abuse or medical terrorism to account for their immune suppression. When I was told in 1988 that I was HIV positive and had about two years to live, it came as a complete shock to me because I did not have a history of what was considered high-risk behaviour. By 1992, I had learned enough to convince me that AIDS was the greatest medical error of all time. As I write this, it has been eleven years since I first got tested. I’ve never developed any AIDS-defining illnesses. In fact I’ve never had a cold in nineteen years. I ride a bike, I take no medications and no treatments – just good food and ten minutes a day exercise for the immune system. I thank God I was smart enough to ‘just say no’ to the doctors, so it didn’t cost me my health. If anything, as a result of what I’ve learned, I’m healthier today than I have ever been.” Ed L.

 

 “I tested positive in 1989 and have been living in wellness without the meds [medications] for ten years - something that still shocks people, even though I’ve always been just fine. After watching my friends get sick and die on AIDS drug therapies, I decided that HIV drugs are poison and you can’t poison yourself back to health. I learned to do nothing for HIV. Instead, I focus on being healthy.” Kim F.

“In 1989, my husband Philip and I were tested HIV positive. We couldn’t believe that two people like us, nice people from nice families, were having to deal first-hand with AIDS. The doctor provided Philip with experimental drugs six months to a year before they were available to the public. At least ten times the doctor told me that Philip would not pull through whatever infection he was going through. Ten times I went through the fear, heartache and panic that I was losing my husband.

Six years after being told he had just months to live, Philip died in my arms.  When I was told it was my turn to take the drugs, I realised I had to make the most important decision of my life. In desperation, I called Christine Maggiore. I asked Christine to give me just the scientific information and nothing else. No stories, no emotional hype, only the facts. I had to go to her office several times to read because I became so distraught that I couldn’t continue for more than fifteen minutes.

Everything I was reading described and explained what I had been through with my husband. My worst fears were being confirmed - the drugs had made my husband suffer tremendously and had eventually killed him. I started attending ‘Alive and Well’ events… ultimately deciding that AIDS drugs were not for me. I decided to trust my own life. Believing in health is the first step to creating a healthy life.  Holding onto the possibility of health is everything.” Cynthia R.

“I tested positive in 1990 and nine years later I am healthy and medication-free. When I was first told I was positive, I went through the standard terror with my life flashing before my eyes. I followed my doctor’s orders for treatment with AZT. After a year of feeling sick, I listened to my inner voice and quit AZT. Except for a brief foray into ddl, I’ve been off meds ever since. I have three recommendations for anyone who tests positive - education, education and education about all aspects and points of view on HIV and AIDS.” Erik D.

“What I find hardest is living with the stigma of HIV. I’m young, healthy, intelligent and very well educated on HIV and AIDS. Yet I am isolated by the fear and ignorance surrounding a condition I don’t even believe in. Being a leader rather than a follower can be lonely and difficult. Maintaining a stance against the majority of the human population is a trying task. I don’t have the time to educate everyone, even if they were interested.  When I do tell others about what I know, they are so convinced that HIV=AIDS=Death, that they think I am doomed and that my optimism is merely fear or hope or both.

I do have hope. I hope that people will look deeper and listen more. That they will demand to be treated as precious beings more important than politics, money and abstract theory. It takes people like us to be the first and the most determined. Life goes on. Choose to be part of it.” Dean W.

“I was required by law to take an HIV test in June 1995. The test is mandatory in Colorado for pregnant women, and I was expecting my second child. I was shocked when the result came back positive, because I’d been married and monogamous for nine years.

I started taking AZT in my fifth month. After ten months on AZT, I was sick all the time. I had constant diarrhoea, nausea, fever, night sweats and was totally exhausted. I was crawling to the bathroom and vomiting for hours. My doctor told me the HIV was making me ill, and that the virus had mutated into a form that was resistant to AZT.  Further drugs turned my skin yellow with jaundice. Since it was clear that the drugs weren’t keeping me from getting AIDS and were actually destroying my liver, I let my prescription run out. I figured I’d rather die from AIDS than liver failure.

Almost immediately after I stopped taking my medicines, within a matter of days I started to feel much better…. My daughter is considered a success by medical standards because she tests negative(!), but I don’t care about HIV anymore. I am concerned about the effects of the AZT she was poisoned with while I was pregnant.  Rachel has an enlarged cranium, seizures and a strange deformity near the base of her spine. At age three she still does not speak. I went to this conference on HIV and pregnancy at The Children’s Hospital here in Denver. A lot of mothers there had taken AZT during pregnancy and had their kids with them. Every single one of those kids had enlarged craniums. Their heads looked exactly like Rachel’s. They’re all AZT babies. I’m working now to repeal Colorado’s mandatory [HIV] testing law.” Kris C.

“In those days, the late eighties, the media pressure was unbearable. I had used heroin for more than two years between 1979 and 1982, so I knew I was at risk. I still remember the dreadful feelings I had, seeing and hearing the TV press campaigns. They pictured tombs, blood and zombie faces, with frightening headlines like “AIDS KILLS… DON’T DIE OF IGNORANCE.” 

In February 1988, I finally summed up the courage to go and be tested for the AIDS virus. I waited nervously in the infectious diseases clinic. I can still remember the doctors’ sad faces as they told me I was HIV positive and that I shouldn’t think to get pregnant until more research on the issue brought better news. The world fell in on me.  Having successfully fought drug use six years previously, the future looked hopeless. According to the impression I had been given, I had at best another five years….

I had met my husband in 1992 and, after we got married in 1994, we started to think about having a child. The doctors tried hard to discourage me from the idea of conceiving. I was disturbed by their conviction that it would be advisable to take AZT during pregnancy, to have a caesarean section and to refrain from breast-feeding. I took AZT for one month only before stopping. 

I gave birth to a wonderful, bouncy, baby girl. My daughter had her first HIV test when still in hospital, and then when she was three and six months old. The tests were all positive. I resisted the intense pressure to administer AZT to her. The last test was done when she was one year old, which was negative. I have decided not to go for any more ritual blood tests. What’s the point if I am convinced there is a gross error at the very base of HIV theory? Meanwhile, I hope to remain as healthy as I am, enjoying my life together with Michael and our daughter.” Monica G.

To Robin Keene, SCHNS,

Communicable Disease Supervisor,

Manatee County Health Department

3rd June 1999

Dear Ms Keene,

Please accept my resignation from employment with the Health Department. After months of struggle and extensive research, I regret I can no longer fulfil the Public Health mandate requirements of my position in good conscience. 

Upon careful investigation, it is woefully apparent that a grand schism has existed in AIDS since Robert Gallo’s politically charged announcement to the world that HIV is the probable cause of AIDS.  Unfortunately, only one side of the scientific data has been made readily available to the general public. This side is far more powerful, backed by the financial storehouses of federal government agencies like the CDC and the NIH, who fund most public information campaigns and research programs. This dominant science is promoted and even manipulated by pharmaceutical giants who have an obvious profit motive. Aided by a willing media, the Public Health Service has all but silenced contrary scientific opinions and thus denied the people their fundamental right to informed consent.

I hereby withdraw my participation in what may one day be seen as the greatest violation of the principle of informed consent in the history of Public Health.

Most sincerely,

Mark Pierpoint

HIV/AIDS Prevention Program Co-ordinator.

(Celia Farber writes: “I tracked Pierpoint down, mainly to ensure that he was for real and not some magical dream I was having. Sure enough, he answered his phone, literally while packing his stuff over at the Manatee Health Department.

“I’m not the only one in here with serious questions about all this,’’ he said. “We all talk about it, and I can tell you there are several more who may follow me.”) [9]

On May 1, 1992, at the age of twenty-nine, I was given five to seven years to live by an HIV specialist. I had been solicited for the test when I went to a health clinic for an entirely different reason. At first I was suicidal, but then I sat about preparing myself for an excruciatingly painful early demise and made ALL my decisions based on the fact I was ‘HIV-positive’ and doomed to die of AIDS.

Over the next ten years, I experienced excellent health and prospered in my business. I married a man who said he did not believe I had HIV or that I would die of AIDS. He said he loved me enough to assist with euthanasia if it came to that, and I felt I owed him my life for his understanding and support.

I supported this man financially and lived my life for him. Feeling I had nothing to live for anyway, I gave him everything he wanted. Unfortunately, all he really wanted was my money. He was incapable of having a loving relationship, and my attempts at creating one with him were met with violence. I endured abuse of every kind, all the while having feelings of guilt for possibly exposing him to HIV. I believed this was the best I could expect and would have sacrificed anything to have this one person in my life who didn’t believe I was going to die of AIDS.

Eventually I learned how not to get beaten up, but there was no intimacy in our marriage, only my giving and him taking. After nearly ten years of that, and in light of my continued good health, I decided I could divorce him, even if it meant I would have to face AIDS on my own. Something had always seemed wrong with the diagnosis anyway.  I wasn’t certain, of course, but there were unanswered questions in the back of my mind:  “How did I catch this?” “Why am I always so healthy?” “Why are antibodies bad?”

One month after I filed for divorce, a man entered my home at 1:40 in the morning and crushed my skull with a 5-pound steel rod while I lay sleeping.  When I opened my eyes, he said, “Your husband wants you f****ed and killed, and I’m just gonna kill you.” He continued to strangle me and eventually damaged most of the bones in my face. But then he stopped and cried: “I can’t do this…. I’m not a murderer…. Why does your husband want you dead?” My husband stood to inherit about half a million dollars upon my death.

The man who attacked me went to jail convicted by a jury of premeditated, attempted first-degree murder, but my ex-husband was never charged. I made a full recovery, except for a barely visible scar above my right temple. I even escaped a brain surgery some of the doctors wanted to perform. I was granted an emergency divorce a month after the attack.

It’s now nearly thirteen years after my ‘diagnosis’, and I’ve had barely a sniffle in the meantime. I’ve never taken any anti-AIDS medicines. Despite my excellent health, the same HIV specialist still insists I’m infected with a contagious, lethal virus and that I’ve put myself at risk having unprotected sex.

When I decided to see the specialist one last time just three months ago, asking her to change my ‘diagnosis’, begging her actually for my life, she refused and wanted to put me on medication; yet she pronounced me in excellent, physical health. I showed her HIV test kit inserts from the tests she gave me that state they are not to be used for diagnosis or confirmation, that positive test results should be ‘confirmed’, that they should not be used as the sole basis for the diagnosis of HIV. She patronizingly explained the testing procedure to me, knowing full well that I completely understood it already, and then stated, “I’ve done everything I’m supposed to do.” She promised to send me a documented study that proves heterosexual transmission of HIV, but no study ever came in the mail.

That’s because as far as I can tell, no such study exists. I’ve asked everyone for it. I’ve posted it on the Internet and I’ve asked doctors and scientists and I’ve searched everywhere I can think to look. No one seems to have the study. It’s just assumed one must have contracted the virus through heterosexual contact in the absence of any other risk factors.

My life has been totally altered because someone doesn’t want to admit they were mistaken. Even though I have no fear of AIDS now, I still must live with the stigma of a diagnosis people go to jail for if they have sex. I can’t get disability, life or health insurance; and of course, there’s absolutely no chance of ever having a normal dating relationship. I’m forty-two years old, single, and childless because I didn’t want to have to take AZT or have a C-section. No one wants to hire, train and promote an HIV-positive person. There is a long list of things I used to take for granted as my rights that I no longer have.

So I have filed a court case against the makers of the HIV tests used to ‘diagnose’ me. The case is barely underway at this time. The disclaimers the manufacturers put in their kit inserts to protect them are no good under the laws of the State of Kansas if they don’t make certain the person buying the test actually knows the disclaimers exist. Well, I didn’t know about those disclaimers, and it was pretty difficult to get my hands on them after I heard about them. I’m asking the court not to allow this to continue to happen to people.

I urge everyone never to take an HIV test. No one knows what they mean, and even the manufacturers state they don’t know how accurate the tests are in ‘low-risk’ populations. After nearly three years of constant study, I’m convinced that HIV=AIDS=Death will turn out to be the biggest snake-oil-remedy scam to which mankind has ever fallen prey. Just follow the money.

Kim Marie Bannon - www.kimbannon.com

[1] Lake, Douglas, The Biology Project,University of Arizona School of Medicine

[2] Maggiore, Christine, What if Everything You Thought You Knew About AIDS Was Wrong, Alive and Well, Studio City, CA 90604, USA

[3] Brink, Anthony, AZT and Heavenly Remedies, Rethinking AIDS Homepage: www.rethinkingaids.com

[4] Refer to “Review of antenatal testing services”, NHS Regional Office, London, UK Dept of Health. Recommending the HIV test became UK national policy in July 1999, and is now mandatory in some US states.

[5] The above disclaimer is included in all Abbott ‘AXSYM’ AIDS tests, the world’s leading supplier of AIDS test kits.

[6] Monetary rewards offered to leading organisations within the scientific community by concerned organisations for reasonable evidence that HIV exists remain uncollected.

[7] Johnson, Christine, Continuum Magazine, September 1996. Maggiore, Christine, What if Everything You Knew about AIDS was Wrong? An Alive and Well Publication, April 2000; Ransom & Day, World Without AIDS, Credence Publications, July 2000. www.credence.org

[8] Kumar et al, Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 7; 1034-9, 1994. JAMA Journal of American Medical Association, 5th January 2000, Incidence of liver damage. World Without AIDS. AZT and enlarged craniums in infants. Refer to www.virusmyth.com for a more comprehensive list of scientific references which catalogue the damage caused by AIDS drugs.

[9] Farber, Celia, A Crack in the Wall, Impressions Magazine, 5th July 1999

If you have a serious, chronic or just annoying health condition, we recommend grabbing one of these books to get you started on the road to exuberant health.

_by Steven Ransom and Phillip Day - This book dismantles one of the world's greatest fears, that of AIDS, and lays bare the deceit, fraudulent science and needless fear-mongering that lies at the heart of this supposed global epidemic.