- A review of more than 100 studies revealed that both aerobic and resistance training are important for maintaining cognitive and brain health in old age
- Moderate exercise can reverse normal brain shrinkage by 2 percent, effectively reversing age-related hippocampus degeneration, which is associated with dementia and poor memory, by one to two years
- Exercise encourages your brain to work at optimum capacity by causing nerve cells to multiply, strengthening their interconnections and protecting them from damage
- Strive to keep your workout regimen dynamic with a variety of activities, including high-intensity, burst-type activities like Peak Fitness, strength training, stretching, core work and more
Story at-a-glance (read the full story here) How vitamin D helps prevent lung cancer04/13/2012 (NaturalNews) Increasing vitamin D may now be a matter of life or death, as recent studies have shown that it may play a vital role in the fight against lung cancer. To date, lung cancer is one of the three most common cancers that kill men and women in developed countries with a statistic of one million deaths every year. Researchers from the University of California at San Diego discovered a correlative relationship between higher rates of lung cancer and less exposure to the sun. Learn more:http://www.naturalnews.com/035282_vitamin_D_lung_cancer_prevention.html#ixzz1sY7kmLKI (Mercola) Story at-a-glance (read the full story here)
Vitamin D found to shrink fibroid tumors04/11/2012 (NaturalNews) Each year, roughly 200,000 women undergo a surgical procedure that involves the removal of their uteruses due to the growth of non-cancerous tumors known as uterine fibroids, which commonly develop in and around the walls of the uterus. But a new study published online in the journal Biology of Reproduction has found that vitamin D may effectively reduce the size of existing uterine fibroids, and may even help prevent them from forming in the first place. Learn more:http://www.naturalnews.com/035234_vitamin_D_fibroids_tumors.html#ixzz1sY6sWUw5 Dental X-rays given to millions of Britons each year may raise the odds of developing a brain tumour. A large-scale study found that men and women with a type of tumour that can affect personality, sight, speech and even paralyse one side of the body, were twice as likely to have had the most common form of dental X-ray than those who were free of the disease. With another type of tooth X-ray, children appeared to be most vulnerable, with those regularly exposed to the low-dose radiation while under the age of ten, at almost five times greater risk. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2127455/Most-common-teeth-X-rays-given-millions-Britons-year-raise-risk-brain-tumours.html#ixzz1sYKqn9sD (NaturalNews) In a stunning development for the ostracized, often criticized, vaccine safety awareness movement, cause celebre, and business mogul, Donald Trump raised concern about vaccinations on Monday, April 2, the anniversary of the fifth annual World Autism Awareness Day. Trump 'warned' Fox News viewers he "stronglybelieves that Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) are linked to exposure to vaccines."1 During the interview, the tycoon revealed that a series of casual observations led him to the conclusion that '"monster" vaccinations cause Autism. The remark was probably a bombshell for pro-vaccine advocates including doctors, pharmaceutical companies, the government - and oh yes, Bill Gates. They have all fervently denied that observation -long a tenet of 'science-based research' - has anything to do with a medical outcome. Trump acknowledged that speaking out against vaccines and the vaccine schedule is very controversial. But then he went on to state: "...I couldn't care less. I've seen people where they have a perfectly healthy child, and they go for the vaccinations and a month later the child is no longer healthy." Trump's statement is a victory for parents who have long believed vaccines contributed to the neurological damage their children suffered post -vaccination. Although Trump is not against vaccines, he has spoken out before regarding his concerns about the increasing number of required immunizations in the childhood vaccination schedule. Read our latest Vaccine Roundup here and read this article in full here. by Phillip Day This is the idea of loading weight onto a muscle to force it to adapt. ‘Weight’ training and resistance training in general are regarded as anaerobic (lit: in the absence of oxygen), as they are ‘short burst’ activities in which oxygen is not the primary catalyst for a muscle’s adaptive change, overcoming resistance is. Resistance/weight training is ideal for people of all ages, especially the elderly, as these exercises build strong bones, firm muscles, strengthened tendons and create a butch immune system. As we age, resistance training becomes more important in overcoming natural somatopause, a term referring to the lowering of natural human growth hormone (HGH) production as we age, coupled with muscular atrophy and a build-up of fat in the adipose, or loose connective tissues. Weight training the way this chapter will show you will accomplish a lot more than just tossing around a few barbells, then heading for the shower. We’ll learn ways of manipulating the process not only to burn out fast and super fast twitch fibres to activate the production of HGH, but also to produce aerobic activity while training with weights. If you don’t want osteoporosis, arthritis, heart problems, cancer, stroke, diabetes, etc., resistance training must play its part in your day. If you’ve already got these problems, resistance training should play A MAJOR PART in your day. Pump up the jam — INTENSITY US Personal trainer Darin Steen writes: “What I have witnessed from over 18,000 personal training sessions over the last 8 years is that most people are wasting their time when they work out. They’re simply not exercising effectively to reap optimal results. The four most common mistakes I see people make are: 1) using the least effective type of exercise: regular cardio. 2) Too much cardio and not enough resistance training. 3) Doing too many sets per exercise. 4) Lifting a weight too fast.”1 In a word, not enough INTENSITY. The major message you should be getting by now is that the body will only adapt to serious physical stress, and the more INTENSITY you bring to bear on your exercises, the more results you’ll see, the quicker you’ll get them and the more time and money you’ll save. Let’s try a barbell exercise to illustrate the technique. This is a bar with weights on either end which you raise up to your chest line using your biceps. Many gyms have a rack of these already set up with different weights so you can ‘run the rack’, as we’ll do in a minute. Through experience (and trial and error), choose a weight which will cause you to fail on the 8–10th repetition (rep/lift). A series of repetitions is called a set. A set of reps is finished when your muscles fail. Make each lift deliberate and slow, breathing out as you exert. Imagine yourself as a piston-driven machine if it helps (with noises to match!). The key here is to make the positive motion (the concentric/exertion/lift/upward motion) as deliberate as possible, and the negative (the downward/eccentric/motion/release) as deliberate as possible. It’s the combination of the two movements – load and unload – not just the lift, which builds muscular strength.2 Especially do not rush the release movement. Studies show that the eccentric/negative/release motionperformed slowly helps preserve strength gains.3 Some top bodybuilders sometimes do ‘negative’ sets to achieve this effect. Do not arch your back, keep it straight. The work should all be done in the arms. These are slow-twitch red muscle fibres you’re working. By the eighth rep you should have a nice burn going (build-up of lactic acid) and things are getting harder. As you approach ten you feel that your muscles are about to fail. Go ahead and fail them and hold the fail position as long as you can. Take a few deep breaths to dissipate the lactic acid burn while you go back to the rack and select a 30% lighter bar. IMMEDIATELY commence the lifts again. It’ll seem easy to start with as there is less weight, but as you move towards the eighth rep, you’ll notice the burn becomes sharper. When you absolutely can’t do another one because your biceps feel like chewing gum, inhale and exhale a couple of deep breaths, then pump out three quick ones, then carefully lower the weight and relax. On these last three reps grit your teeth and feel the body become suddenly warm. Again, it’s important to gear the weight so you absolutely fail by the tenth rep. This will provide the requisite stress on the fast twitch muscle fibres which are now in play. Take a few deep breaths to dissipate the lactic acid burn while selecting a further 30% lighter bar on the rack. IMMEDIATELY commence the lifts again. It seems deceptively easy to start with as there is even less weight than before, but as you move towards the eighth rep, you’ll notice the burn sharpen again. When you absolutely can’t do another one because your biceps feel like Bolognese, inhale and exhale a couple of deep breaths, then pump out three quick ones, then carefully lower the weight and relax. On these last three reps grit your teeth and feel the body suddenly warm. Again, it’s important to gear the weight so you absolutely fail by the tenth rep. This will provide the requisite stress on the super-fast twitch ‘white’ fibres which are now in play. This technique is known as ‘stripping’, ‘super-setting’ or ‘running the rack’. You’re not just doing one set of ten reps, then going to have a natter with your friends, you’re compounding three or four strips in one set and piling on theINTENSITY. When you get some practice at this, you’ll end up lifting an absurdly light weight, screaming the house down as the last of your super-fast twitchers run up the surrender flag. Notice that the bog-standard lift would only work the comfortable red muscle so you wouldn’t get the faster twitch muscles activating the production of HGH. Adaptive change is the miracle contained inINTENSITY, and HEALING is the miracle contained in ADAPTIVE CHANGE. Ergo: you have to exercise with INTENSITY to stimulate the release of natural human growth hormone and GALVANISE THE HEALING PROCESS. The weight/cycling regimen: 3–4 times a week – no more! An ideal starting exercise regimen for 8/80-year-olds is laid out below – it’s the one I use if time is tight. You’ll need a gym for this lot so get serious, they are plenty cheap deals these days. Start meek and ease into it – you don’t have to become a hardcore professional in one session – the body will thank you too. You’ll be doing initial exercises designed to work the largest muscle groups in the body. Ensure no more than one minute’s rest between the sets4 of any particular exercise to prevent the body cooling down and disrupting muscle stress. It is a good idea to work with trainers available in gyms to maximise the benefit of correct technique if you are unsure, but once you’ve got the action down, “The sky’s the limit, baby!” as Ted Turner would undoubtedly say. As you become more proficient at training with weights, you can move to the smaller muscle groups and work them directly, such as biceps, triceps, shoulder delts, spinal erectors, calves, etc. Notice that these smaller groups are hit anyway when you do the major lifts. For instance, when you are doing bench press, the triceps and front shoulder delts come into play on the positive (lift), and biceps and rear delts are working if the negative (down-cycle) is done slowly. Some beginners make the mistake of working their triceps before doing bench presses, which means their arms are shot and the chest won’t get worked. It’s dangerous too as the arms can suddenly fail and the weight crash down onto your chest. Always use a spotter (a buddy/member of staff) when lifting heavy weight which might injure you. Here we go: WARM UP WITH PEAK PERFORMANCE CYCLING OR STAIRMASTER (see previous chapter on aerobic exercise). BARBELL LEG SQUATS (3 SETS X 10 REPETITIONS (REPS)) Place barbell across the back of the neck, raise your chin and squat down (the negative) with your back kept straight, toes pointed slightly out, chest out, buttocks out. (You can use dumbbells instead and simply hold them down by your sides if you prefer). Do not arch your back, the movement is all in the hips and leg. You should fold at the waist, everything above that being fixed. Stop when your thighs are almost parallel to the ground. Then press the weight up slowly and deliberately, taking the strain into the thighs, breathing out on the positive/exertion/lift. Do not arch your back on this bit either. Do the first set as a warm-up, failing at the 8–10th rep. Then do the last two sets ‘running the rack’, i.e. lowering the weight each time you fail until you end up with no weight, blubbing your eyes out as you press out those final three. You’ll need a mate for this one to relieve you of the weight or assist you when your legs fail. Sounds dramatic and when you do it right, it is! Make sure there’s a bench close by so you can rest. BENCH PRESS (3 SETS X 10 REPS) Do the first set as a warm-up, failing at the 8–10th rep. Then do the last two sets ‘running the rack’, i.e. lowering the weight each time you fail until you end up with a tiddly bar, groaning like Michael Winner over his tax return. Once again, when you absolutely can’t do another one because your chest/arms are on fire, inhale and exhale a couple of deep breaths, then pump out two quick ones, then carefully lower the weight and relax. On these last reps, grit your teeth and feel the body suddenly warm. Again, it’s important to gear the weight so you absolutely fail by the tenth rep. Lowering the weight by 30–40% in each case works for me. This provides the requisite stress on the fast twitch fibres which are now coming into play. You’ll need a staff member/mate for this one also to relieve you of the weight or assist if your arms fail. LAT PULL-DOWNS (3 SETS X 10 REPS) Be seated, choose a weight which will fail you at the 8–10th rep. anchor your rear-end on the seat and pull the bar down to your chest and back of the neck alternately. Do the first set as a warm-up, failing at the 8–10th rep. Then do the last two sets ‘running the rack’, i.e. lowering the weight each time you fail until you end up with a miniscule weight, back muscles crawling like fleas as you press out those final three. SEATED ROWING (3 SETS X 10 REPS) Same goes for the seated rowing machine — you’re getting the pattern now. SIT-UPS (2 SETS UNTIL MUSCLE FAILURE) We all know this one and avoid it like measles. Just get on with it, go for the burn, it’s over before you know it, then go and see Mother. LIGHT CYCLING TO FINISH OFF, RAISING THE SWEAT, SHEEN AND GLOW. Hit the showers. Do the weights in this regimen no more than twice a week for now. Recovery time is everything. Aerobic supersets Although weight-training is primarily an anaerobic activity, you can ‘aerobicise’ it by training different muscle groups together. For instance, you can do bench press sets interspersed with calves raises, which sends the blood rocketing from your top end, downstairs, then back up to your chest again, forcing the heart to work harder. Some trainers work chest in with back, arms with legs, etc. to get this effect. Static contraction training Not for the faint-hearted or beginners. This is for serious power-lifters and those seeking bodybuilding effects. Increase the weight of a particular exercise so you fail on the second or third rep, then run the rack to burn out the fast and super-fast fibre by stripping weight off for subsequent reps. This brings incredible intensity to bear on a particular muscle group but you are using a lot more weight so you need to work safely. Very important: One static contraction workout across the basic muscle groups (chest, back, arms and legs) will be it for the week. Rest and recuperation are very important so don’t overdo and get sick. Notes * It doesn’t matter whether you are 8 or 80, ease into weight training if you’ve never done it before, you’ll be amazed at how great the body feels afterwards. This is the New Frontier within you which you’ve never explored. There’s healing and peace here, along with a whole host of remedial and anti-ageing benefits. * Learn the ropes and get your technique right. If you don’t want to join a gym, there’s a fair bit you can do at home with a little imagination. For instance, you can do press-ups on the floor, then as you fail, drop your knees to the ground and pump out those last few before collapsing and munching the carpet. Squats can be done easily at home with or without weight (dumbbells). * Bone density is sharply enhanced by weight-training, especially in the elderly. Natural News writes: “If you don’t want to spend your later years resting in a nursing home, losing your independence and draining your or your family’s financial resources, you need to do something to remain independent. According to numerous studies and aging manuals, that “something” is strength training, an activity known to increase bone mass and thus decrease the possibility of osteoporosis.”5 * As for children, Reuters Health writes: “While strength training was once doubted to benefit kids, a new research review confirms that children and teenagers can boost their muscle strength with regular workouts. The findings, researchers say, support recent recommendations from the National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA) that kids strength-train two to three times a week — though only under professional supervision.”6 * Females take note: Weight training will not make you bulky unless you are taking anabolic steroids. That unfeminine musculature on women in magazines can only be achieved pharmaceutically and with extreme diets. Females have only one hundredth of the androgen hormone levels of men, so all that’s likely to happen if you work out hard is a lean and dangerous blody like Halle Berry or Jamie Lee Curtis (shame). By exercising properly and naturally you will tone your muscles, burn excess fat, normalise hormones and blood-sugar and approach your lean bodyweight so long as your diet is right. * Diet and hydration are important to assist in repair and recovery. You do not need heavy animal protein powders which can overload the body and produce protein poisoning. Your body makes proteins specific to you according to yourDNA blueprint, not from dead cows. All you need to supply is a muscle destruction/impact effect via your exercise and lots of protein building blocks (amino acids) to repair the muscle and activate general healing systems andHGH in the body afterwards. The single greatest source of usable amino acids on Earth is the plant kingdom. Which means that raw plant foods should make up the bulk of your diet. More about this later. * Ensure you rest a muscle group for at least three to four days. A good guide is to wait until any muscle soreness dissipates before re-working. The more you exercise, the less sore your muscles will be as they adapt. Once they have adapted, though, you need to increase the weight and intensity to move to the next level, if you want to move to the next level. If you don’t, you can maintain the weight and simply increase the number of reps until your fast and super-fast fibres fail, ensuring that you take advantage of this mechanism to generate natural human growth hormone and galvanise the body’s cellular repair systems. Extracted with permission from The Essential Guide to Exercise by Phillip Day 1 www.mercola.com 2 Aurelius A, Why Exercise? op. cit. 3 Colliander EB, Tesch, PA “Effects of detraining following short-term resistance training on eccentric and concentric muscle strength”, Acta Physiol Scand. 1992;144:23 4 A set is a series of exercise repetitions (reps) comprising a unit of exercise, e.g. bench pressing a weight 10 times comprises 1 set of 10 reps. 5 www.naturalnews.com/010528.html 6 www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE69P3M120101026. See also Pediatrics November 2010; 126(5):e1199-210 (Mercola) Story at-a-glance (read the full story here)
(Mercola) Story at a glance (read the full story here)
Is This Fraud Too Big Even For 60 Minutes?03/16/2012 by Dr Mercola Story at-a-glance
Is This Fraud Too Big Even For 60 Minutes? Exposure and subsequent concern over medical research fraud is on the rise, and for good reason. It's now reached the point where blogs exist solely to cover retractions of published researchi. An episode of 60 Minutes, featured above, also highlights the problem. In this episode, they reveal the dramatic rise and fall of Dr. Anil Potti, whose cancer research at Duke University was heralded as a groundbreaking game changer. It's a perfect example of how fraud can occur anywhere. Even at the best institutions. Dr. Potti's work, which entailed matching a patient's tumor to the best chemotherapy drug based on its DNA makeup, was the most exciting cancer breakthrough in recent history, according to many involved. More than 100 cancer-stricken and desperate patients signed up for Dr. Potti's trial. Unfortunately, two years ago, it became apparent that the method was a failure. Not only that, but as stated in the 60 Minutes segment, Dr. Potti's discovery "may end up being one of the biggest medical research frauds ever; one that deceived dying patients, the best medical journals, and a great University." Dr. Potti May have Faked Both Credentials and Research Data Questions about Dr. Potti's research had been raised, but were cleared by a committee at Duke University. It wasn't until a confidential source tipped off the editor of The Cancer Letter to take another look at Dr. Potti's claim of being a Rhodes Scholar that the lies began unraveling. Joseph Nevins, Dr. Potti's mentor and coworker at Duke University for over four years confronted him about the accusation he may have lied on his resume. Potti admitted that he wasn't really a Rhodes Scholar, rather it was a fellowship from Rhodes Scholars in Australia... Nevins decided to take another look at Dr. Potti's original data, eventually concluding that it was "abundantly clear" Potti had purposefully manipulated the data. Whenever the data disproved Potti's theory, the data had simply been altered. The claim that the novel procedure had an 80 percent chance of success was a complete lie, and patients in Potti's trial died. Some of the surviving family members are now suing. Dr. Potti has stated that he "... was not aware that false or 'improper' information had been included in the research." Duke University has also apologized for the trials, and has opened up about the case to serve as a warning example to other institutions. But the greatest irony of all is brought up at the very end of the 60 Minutes' segment. While patients did not receive any groundbreaking treatment, Duke University has stated that none of the patients in Dr. Potti's failed trial were really harmed "because all of them received the standard of care in chemotherapy." And THAT, my friends, is the real "Biggest Medical Fraud" of all time. It's so big, 60 Minutes will not likely discuss that truth any time soon. In reality, virtually the entire cancer industry is one massive fraud, in the sense that it's not really allowing authentic and inexpensive cancer cures that address the cause of the problem to come to market. They are virtually all violently opposed and condemned. It's a massive for-profit industry, and unless a treatment revolves around a costly drug that can be patented, it will never see the light of day. The whole idea that the cancer industry is "searching for a cure" is a sham... because cures already exist. But they're being massively suppressed. Why Many Groundbreaking Cancer Therapies are Suppressed It's kind of sad to hear how Dr. Potti's idea of using DNA-matching to customize treatments created such waves of excitement, knowing that similar gene-target therapies have been vehemently suppressed, simply because they did not involve expensive pharmaceuticals patented by Big Pharma. Burzynski: The Movie tells the story of Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski, who developed a non-toxic gene-target cancer therapy called antineoplastons, and has been harassed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for over 14 years in an effort to shut him down. His treatment could have helped save millions of lives over the last two decades had his discovery not been criminally suppressed by the U.S. government, as it has been shown to effectively help cure some of the most "incurable" forms of terminal cancer. The film is a powerful expose of the unscrupulous forces that work to maintain the status quo of the medical and pharmaceutical industry at any cost. Why was Dr. Burzynski attacked while Dr. Potti was worshipped as a wunderkind? Potti was working within "the standard of care," matching chemotherapy drugs to the DNA of patient's tumors, while Burzynski's antineoplastons are non-toxic peptides and derivatives of amino acids that work as genetic switches. In short, Dr. Burzynski developed a cancer treatment that surpassed all other treatments on the market, and the FDA, the pharmaceutical industry, and the National Cancer Institute all knew it. But he was also the sole owner of the patents for this therapy, and these two facts combined threatened the entire paradigm of the cancer industry. The cancer paradigm is based on very expensive machines and toxic drugs. There's an enormous amount of money to be made in this paradigm, no one in the cancer industry, aside from Burzynski himself, stand to make a dime if his treatment is granted approval and goes mainstream. That's why it has been suppressed, despite the fact that antineoplastons have been shown to be far more effective than the current standard of care. The film features several remarkable case stories of people who were successfully cured of cancer, but it's when the clinical trial data of conventional therapies versus antineoplastons are stacked against each other that the benefits of antineoplastons become really obvious: Radiation or Chemotherapy - Only 5 of 54 patients (9 percent) were cancer free at the end of treatment - Toxic side OnlyAntineoplastons - 5 of 20 (25 percent) were cancer free at the end of treatment effects - No toxic side effects Systemic Corruption within the FDA Threatens Your Health Unfortunately, our government plays a significant and ongoing role in the committing of this kind of scientific fraud. I recently commented on the fact that the FDA secretly monitored the personal e-mail of nine whistleblowers—its own scientists and doctors—over the course of two years. The whistleblowers, who worked in the office responsible for reviewing medical devices, including those for cancer screening, had warned Congress that the agency was approving medical devices that posed unacceptable risks to patients. Jeffrey Shuren, director of the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health kept pushing for the Department of Health and Human Services' (DHHS) inspector general to investigate the employees, accusing them of improperly disclosing confidential business information about the devices. Shuren is also the official who oversees mercury dental fillings, which they have been fraudulently referring to as 'silver fillings'. He had promised to make an announcement about dental amalgam by the end of 2011. But with just six minutes left in the work year, at 4:54 pm on Friday, December 30, the FDA conceded that no announcement was forthcoming – not in 2011, and maybe not at all. I've long questioned the safety of mammography, based on compelling information from scientists and experts in the field. Here, we have a number of FDA employees warning Congress that the agency is placing patient's lives at risk, due to internal corruption... and still nothing is done. The fact is, a lot of what the general public assumes is "science-based medicine" is anything but. According to one recent poll for the British Medical Journal, one in 10 scientists and doctors claim to have witnessed colleague's deliberately fabricating data in order to get their research publishedii. Back in 2005, Dr. John Ioannidis, an epidemiologist at Ioannina School of Medicine, Greece, showed that there is less than a 50 percent chance that the results of any randomly chosen scientific paper will be true! He repeated his investigation in 2008 and found that much of scientific research being published is highly questionable. According to his study: "Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true." Add to that the fact that the FDA is not doing its stated job either, and it should be quite clear that there's really no one out there protecting your health from dangerous pharmaceuticals and medical treatments... Notable Cases of Medical Fraud While many believe Dr. Potti may go down as the largest medical science fraud case in modern history, we've seen several stunning cases in the last few years. Tragically, some if not all of them may have contributed to significant health ramifications and loss of life of many thousands of people:
Ultimately, my take-home message here is that even if a drug or treatment is scientifically proven, all these examples make it crystal clear that this simply is not a guarantee of safety or effectiveness. Likewise, if an alternative treatment has not been published in a medical journal, it does not mean it is unsafe or ineffective. There's a lot to be said for the tried-and-true remedies of old, even if they've not been rigorously studied by modern researcher. I recommend using all the resources available to you, including your own sense of common sense and reason, true experts' advice and other's experiences, to determine what medical treatment or advice will be best for you in any given situation. Remain skeptical but open -- even if it is something I am saying, you simply need to realize YOU are responsible for your health, not me and certainly not drug companies trying to sell their wares. Seeing how it's been well established that most drugs do absolutely nothing to treat the cause of disease, it would be prudent to exercise the precautionary principle when evaluating ANY new drug claim, as it will more than likely be seriously flawed or biased -- and is most likely not in your long-term best interest. If you're facing a health challenge, I recommend seeking out a qualified natural health consultant. A good place to look for recommendations is at your local health food store. Get to know the people who work there, the owners, and those who frequent the store, and obtain a consensus as to who the best clinician for you is in your area. Word travels fast in the natural medical community, so if there's a knowledgeable practitioner in your area that's getting awesome results, his or her reputation will be known. Of course, when it comes to cancer, you'll want to identify someone that is well known and respected for their work in treating cancer patients. If you don't find one locally then scour the Internet and make calls to plenty of patients that the practitioner has seen. References: |
RSS Feed